Understanding unfunded pensions

LAST UPDATED: 12 Jan, 2015 @ 00:52
1
SHARE
Understanding unfunded pensions

PEOPLE are asking me more questions about unfunded pensions.

In an earlier article, I said there was ‘no pot of gold’ in such schemes.

However, as P Trippett wrote to the Olive Press to say, Local Government Schemes are in fact funded and I had erroneously included them in my list of unfunded schemes.

However, there are many other pensions which are unfunded including, for example, the UK State Pension Scheme.
I have been asked to expand on this and to explain what it means.

Pensions broadly fall under three categories; they are either defined contribution (DC), defined benefit (DB) or State pensions.

DC schemes are set up as a long-term plan and the level of pension benefits available in retirement will be determined by how much money is in the pension pot at that time. This in turn relies on contribution levels and investment growth.

DB schemes have benefits that are defined at the outset and often referred to as a final salary schemes. The level of benefits payable will be determined by the number of years of service and the final pensionable salary at retirement age. There is no investment risk for the members, providing their employer can honour the benefits that have been promised.

In the private sector, DB schemes will mainly have a large pension pot set aside to meet the liabilities arising when people retire and want their pensions paid to them. Some such schemes are fully-funded but many are underfunded, which could have a negative impact for people requesting a transfer value, for example.

In the public sector, however, and with State pensions, these are largely on a ‘pay as you go’ basis. This means that the pensions being paid this year have to come from the current year’s budget, rather than reserves. This is why such a large proportion of the budget for some organisations is set aside each year to pay the pensioners, before they even start to fund the operation for the current year.

The impact of changing demographics is visible in the State Pension Scheme that is on a ‘pay as you go’ basis, with pensions each year being funded from National Insurance contributions being paid by people who are working that year. Hence ‘pay as you go’.

This system works well when you have an increasing working population when compared to the number of pensioners. While employment in the UK is at an all-time high, so is the number of people beyond retirement age. In fact, this population is growing faster than the increase in the rate of employment, as people are living longer and the ‘baby boomers’ move into retirement.

This is why the State pension age has been increased – and will continue to be increased in the future – to help soften the impact.

JOIN THE CONVERSATION...

The Olive Press are not responsible and do not moderate individual comments before they are posted. Anyone who uses racist, sexist, homophobic or xenophobic language or hate speech will be blocked.
  1. The final comment says : This is why the State pension age has been increased – and will continue to be increased in the future – to help soften the impact.
    It used to be 44 yrs then reduced to 30, then increased to 35, so what in heavens name was it ever reduced at all for ?
    Had it been left as it was, then money would be coming in for a longer time from those employers and employees prior to them retiring, surely a no-brainer given the situation.
    The politicians keep on tinkering with the rules and are supposed to be simplifying the process and on top of that they are moving the age which I see as reasonable over time but why could they not just simplify the existing system that over the years they have found time to complicate it ! What have they done ? Dreamed up a new Pensions Bill that includes much of the bad old system with the worst part being the inclusion of the denial of the indexing for just a minority of pensioners which was one of the problems causing much unnecessary correspondence and ill feeling across the world especially as it promoting discrimination.

HAVE YOUR SAY...