Brexit: What it may mean to your State Pension

LAST UPDATED: 12 Jan, 2017 @ 19:55
6
SHARE

brexitTHERE are two pension issues (state pensions rather than occupational pensions) that I come across frequently when talking to people living in the EU about the implications that Brexit may have.

The first is Pensioner Rights for working people, and the second is the potential ‘freezing’ of the UK state pension.

Pensioner Rights

With most EU countries state pensions are earned (they are a right, and not a benefit) based on the number of years of contributions made to the social security system in each EU country.  In today’s mobile world, and free movement of labour throughout the EU, there are a significant number of people who have acquired state pension rights in more than one country – for example, Sally worked 8 years in the UK, got married and emigrated to Spain where she has worked for 12 years. In total, she has state pension contributions of 20 years, and therefore she qualifies for a state pension in both the UK and Spain since the 20 years of contributions she has made is more than the minimum in the UK (10 years) and Spain (15 years).  How much Sally will receive may be calculated differently in each country depending on both the consolidated number of years of contributions made across all EU countries as well as the number of years contribution Sally has made in each EU country. Her weekly UK state pension (based on today’s rates), is calculated as 8/35 x £119.31 = £27.27, since the consolidated number of Sally’s contribution years throughout the EU is 20 (even though she only has 8 years contributions in the UK and the minimum is 10 years).

In Spain, it is slightly more complicated, since Sally’s Spanish pension is calculated using several different amounts – the ‘EU equivalent amount’ and the ‘national amount’, and Sally will receive the higher of the two amounts. The ‘EU equivalent amount’ is calculated based by consolidating the number of years contributions Sally has made throughout the EU (8 years + 12 years = 20 years) – this is called the ‘theoretical amount’. This amount is then pro-rated based on the number of years Sally has worked in Spain (12 years/20 years), and this is called the ‘pro-rated amount’, so if the full state pension in Spain is worth €1,200 per month, then the ‘pro-rated amount’ would be €720 per month. The ‘national pension’ (also known as the ‘independent benefit’) is calculated based on Sally’s contributions in Spain (alone). Since Sally has worked for 12 years in Spain, she does not qualify for a Spanish state pension based on her years of contributing in Spain, since the minimum number of qualifying years is 15, and Sally only has 12 years.  Sally will get £109 [£27.27 x 4) every four weeks from the UK and €720 per month from Spain.

However, all of this may change as part of the Brexit negotiations. In the ‘do nothing’ scenario i.e. there would be nothing specifically in the Brexit negotiations to cover this, then it is a distinct possibility that the UK National Insurance contribution record will not be consolidated with the other periods worked in the EU. So, in Sally’s case, her 8 years worked in the UK is insufficient for her to receive a pension there (since the minimum is 10 years) and her 12 years worked in Spain is insufficient for her to receive a pension there either (since the minimum in Spain is 15 years of contributions). Sally would not qualify for a state pension in either country. It would seem that Sally should keep on working in Spain for another three years, and then at least she would qualify for a Spanish state pension, regardless of what happens with Brexit. Click here to find out how the state pension works in the EU.

UK State Pension ‘freezing’

The UK government currently uprates the UK State Pension annually based on ‘triple lock’ (the higher of inflation, increase in wages, or 2.5%) only in countries where they are ‘legally obliged’’ and this has been the case for over 70 years. Today, this means that pensioners living in the UK, the EU and a small number of disparate countries around the world receive the annual increase, whilst UK pensioners living in other countries don’t receive that annual increase. So, if you live in the US, you will receive the annual increase. However, if you live just across the border in Canada, then you don’t receive an increase. Live in Jamaica and you receive the annual increase; live in Trinidad and Tobago and you don’t receive the increase – in fact, there are over half a million UK pensioners living in over 120 countries who do not receive the annual increase – this is known as the UK ‘frozen’ pension policy.

pension-justiceThe ICBP sent a Christmas greeting to every UK Member of Parliament featuring Vic Williams (pictured right). Vic comes from Ontario Canada, and is a war veteran. When asked why he joined the Royal Navy, he said: “because it was the right thing to do”. A few years ago, he made a personal plea (video) to David Cameron asking him to “do the right thing” and end the ‘frozen pension’ policy, but his plea fell on deaf ears. He feels he has been abandoned by his country since his UK state pension is the same today as it was when he first retired. I use Vic as an illustration of what may happen when the UK leaves the EU, and takes the ‘do nothing’ option (i.e. no specific provision is made within the exit negotiations covering the annual increase to the UK state pension for pensioners living in the EU). If this option is taken, the UK will no longer be ‘legally obliged’ to pay the annual UK State Pension increase to pensioners living in the EU. Over a period of 20 years The Telegraph has estimated that this could leave pensioners £50,000 poorer. The table below shows how Pension Erosion has affected UK pensioners like Vic living in “frozen” countries:

pension-erosion

A “frozen” pensioner retiring between April 1998 and March 1999 (the blue line, above) on a “full” UK State Pension (i.e. with the maximum number of contribution years) will be £25,000 poorer compared to their peers living in the UK. Today, the UK state pension is nearly twice what it was in 1998 so the figure reported in The Telegraph would seem to be accurate. To put this into context, there are 85,000 ‘frozen’ pensioners who are, like Vic aged 85 or over, so, if like Vic they received a full UK state pension, then, collectively, they are more than £2.1 billion poorer because they decided to emigrate.  The ICBP is very concerned that this may happen to UK pensioners living in the EU.

The ICBP has been working for years to try and persuade the UK government to end this discriminatory practice of pension ‘freezing’. We are very concerned that the UK government will see the annual increase to the State Pension for pensioners living in the EU as an opportunity to save money as part of the Brexit negotiations. The current cost to annually increase UK state pensions in the EU will be £46.6 million. If you are worried that your UK State Pension will become “frozen”, then click here and sign their petition and make your voice heard! We receive our funding from pension lobby groups in Canada and Australia, which is where most of the ‘frozen’ pensioners are currently living. Around 40% of membership fees are used to maintain their presence in the UK media, and keeping this issue in front of Parliamentarians. If you would like to help us with this campaign, please click here.

As the Brexit negotiations progress we shall be following these two pension issues very closely.

Subscribe: Olive Press news to your inbox

SHARE
Previous articleAndalucian man faces 12 years for pouring boiling water on infant
Next articleAndalucians to take to streets in new campaign to get to know homeless people
I am a UK national who retired and emigrated to Canada in 2008. I became interested in the Canadian Alliance of British Pensioners (CABP) last year when I realised that when I start to receive my UK state pension it will be “frozen” at the first payment amount - I will not receive the annual indexation amount. Prior to retiring to Canada I spent my entire career in Information Technology (IT), working for many years in London and briefly abroad. I spent several years working for large international law firms being responsible for their various global accounting systems. Nigel Nelson is a contributor to the Olive Press, and is the Chairman of the non-profit International Consortium of British Pensioners (ICBP) – www.pensionjustice.org.

6 COMMENTS

The Olive Press are not responsible and do not moderate individual comments before they are posted. Anyone who uses racist, sexist, homophobic or xenophobic language or hate speech will be blocked.
  1. As one of the “frozen”pensioners living in Australia for the past 11 years I can empathize with your concerns. We have been fighting for years for the government in UK of both political persuasions to do the right thing and uprate our pensions on an annual basis as elsewhere. I paid my full 44 years of contributions and should therefore receive the same upratings as those who live in UK (and elsewhere) – country of residence should not come into the equation. Unfortunately, as the government is not legally obliged to do this it seems highly unlikely that anything will dramatically change while I am still alive and if those residing in the EU also lose their upratings then a major backward step would have been taken, just as we think we can see a glimmer of light at the end of this long dark tunnel over here. Politicians pensions, retirement packages, expense accounts, travel perks etc are totally protected of course and sacrosanct – over here we are being asked to tighten our belts to help reduce the deficit while they continue to rort the system and some of the major worldwide corporations (Exxon Mobil for example) pay NO TAX here from annual Australian earnings of approx $8 billion !! Where is a revolution when we need one !!

  2. Well said. British Pensions In Australia (BPiA) – http://www.bpia.org.au is fighting on behalf of all UK pensioners living in Australia, and are one of our ‘parent’ companies. We are all not-for-profit organizations manned by volunteers (mostly) – certainly at Director level. If you haven’t checked them out, it might be worth your while.

    Thanks again for your resoonse

  3. I have written to my local M.P. who is a cabinet member of the Canadian government. I have not received any reply. This was as recommended by CABP So it seems that the Trudeau regime oes not care. I have been frozen since 1990, now aged 91.

    The pound is still falling in value too.

    • Thank you for writing to your Member of Parliament. Historically, the Canadian government have been very supportive towards the frozen pensioners. CABP has received some positive responses from the Trudeau government (Mr. Morneau, particularly), and they will keep reinforcing the same message. Unfreeze our pensions (now)!

HAVE YOUR SAY...