27 Jun, 2014 @ 12:30
1 min read

Determining the legality of a business in a residential complex

antonio flores

A HUGE number of disputes between ‘Communities of Owners’ find their way to the courts.

The nature of these disputes ranges from the rather boring claims over unpaid dues to the more exciting topic of what may or may not be allowed within the urbanization.

So which activities are deemed illegal?

In principle, those forbidden expressly by the statutes.

As a rule of thumb, the following are illegal: activities deemed cumbersome, immoral, obnoxious, unhealthy, dangerous or contrary to morals.

These might include opening a bar, a laboratory, a massage parlour, a poker room, or for example a drug user who lets the home and himself reach a state of total decay.

I have even heard of dog or cat breeding businesses being overruled and in another case a judge deemed that an insurance brokerage was a noisy activity and thus banned it… on the grounds that the clients used the lift continuously…

And what about noisy neighbours, how is that dealt with?

This is a tricky one as what is acceptable for someone may be wrong for someone else and where in doubt, a dispute is bound to arise.

The difficulty to deal with such disputes has resulted in the Theory of Due Tolerance. This theory encapsulates five principles:

1. Reciprocity: if for example other neighbours do the same unopposed, we may infer it is correct to follow suit
2. Just or fair balance: if diverse behaviours are not on a collision path, they should be allowed to exist
3. ‘Estoppel’: it stops one going against one’s own actions
4. Prolonged consent: if a certain behaviour goes unopposed for a long period of time, consent is assumed
5. Permissiveness: it mixes consent with the notion of social acceptability

Antonio Flores (Columnist)

Lawyer Antonio Flores is the legal columnist for the Olive Press. Antonio has been practising law since 1997, year in which he began working for a large law firm in Marbella as a Property Lawyer. In 1998 he left the company he had joined a few months earlier, and used his knowledge and the experience gained to build his own practice. He is known throughout the community as independent, reputable and trustworthy. Through a combination of strong work ethics, determination and international exposure, his competence of Spanish Law is unparalleled and demonstrated through his fluency in English and Spanish.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

la alberca GV e
Previous Story

Jump in: No English allowed

ebola disease
Next Story

Ebola virus may have made its way into Spain

Latest from Antonio Flores: Legal Problems

Go toTop