- Andalucia
- Almeria
- Cadiz
- Cordoba
- Granada
- Huelva
- Jaen
- Malaga
- Sevilla
- National
- Gibraltar
- OP Xtreme
- Features
- Business & Finance
- Celebrities
- Crime & Law
- Food Drink
- Entertainment
- Environment
- Health
- Nature
- News Features
- Property
- Sport
- Travel
- Blogs
- Eating Out
- Almeria
- Cadiz
- Cordoba
- Granada
- Huelva
- Jaen
- Malaga
- Sevilla
- Andalucia Property Search

Green Guide
Stolen babies to remain in Malaga graves
PUBLISHED:
February 10, 2013 at
10:12 am • LAST EDITED:
February 9, 2013 at
9:36 pm
Andalucia, Lead, Malaga •
0 Comments
|
| • A recent Aberoa protest |
By Kathryn Richardson
A PLANNED mass exhumation of a cemetery in Malaga, believed to contain the remains of stolen babies, has been stalled.
Representatives of the Association of Andalusia Stolen Babies (Aberoa) have been told that a general exhumation of the San Rafael cemetery would not be possible.
Campaign group, Aberoa, believes there may still be remains buried in the cemetery from Franco’s regime which authorised hospitals and religious groups to take newborns away from their mothers for moral or ideological reasons.
Aberoa president, Isabel Aguera, argued that cases should be reactivated but the authorities have ruled they should carry out further research and only reopen cases when new facts came to light.
Aberoa Counsel said they were disappointed by the meeting’s outcome.
In the province of Malaga there are currently around 80 complaints of alleged theft of babies, believed to have taken place in the 1960s and 1970s.
Many complainants say their cases have been abandoned.
Aberoa have been taking part in a series of demonstrations with other pressure groups to try and force the authorities to move things forward.
The Olive Press recently told how stolen baby Quiqui Olivert managed to track down his birth parents.
He was taken from them at his birth in 1965 because they were unmarried but discovered the pensioners living in Northern Spain still together.
Reader Comments »
Messages will be moderated or deleted if they:
• Are considered likely to disrupt, provoke, attack or offend others
• Are racist, sexist, homophobic, sexually explicit, abusive or otherwise objectionable
• Contain swear words or other language likely to offend
• Break the law or condone or encourage unlawful activity. This includes breach of copyright, defamation and contempt of court
• Advertise products or services for profit or gain
• Are seen to impersonate someone else
• Include contact details such as phone numbers, postal or email addresses
• Describe or encourage activities which could endanger the safety or well-being of others




