12 May, 2016 @ 11:00
1 min read

The Podemos path: The Spanish Supreme Court also steers to the Left

podemos e

Antonio FloresTENS of thousands of Spanish consumers, most of them paradoxically right-wing PP voters, probably owe radical left-party Podemos a long-awaited recognition.

They will have benefitted from several rulings issued by the ‘Tribunal Supremo’ against banks and financial institutions in one particular year, 2015.

Podemos, a left-wing populist party that seeks to address the problems of inequality and corruption, including banking abuses suffered by ordinary citizens, was founded in March 2014 in the aftermath of the 11-M Movement.

Millions were galvanised around this idea of social justice and, within them, a good number of top judges and magistrates.

The Supreme Court (SC) was also swayed and 2015 saw the following ground-breaking rulings:


Single-premium or Whole of Life insurance policies: In February 2015 the SC ruled that life insurance policies which are nothing but financial investments, i.e. insurance ‘wrappers’, will have to comply with the same standards of protection of consumers as financial investments, irrespective of whether it is a named as an insurance product or service.

This implies a suitability check, sufficient disclosures and advice for the client to understand the risks and clear information on the product.

In March 2015, the SC ruled that any life insurance bond made up solely for the purpose of investment faces one very serious prospect: being declared void by Spanish Courts.

Already six cases have ended up with faux insurance policies being terminated on these grounds, with the effect that the premium is to be returned.


Off-plan property deposits: In May 2015, and in December 2015, the SC ruled that property developers are responsible ‘in any event’ of down payments made by consumers on off-plan properties, provided the bank was aware of the purpose of the payments.


Multicurrency mortgage loans: In June 2015 the SC ruled that multicurrency loans are deemed financial derivatives, which are complex high-risk financial products.

The implication of this ruling is that average consumers will be able to argue that if the bank did not provide them with correct and clear information prior to signing for this product, the bank can and will be held responsible for mis-selling. The same applies to consumer suitability checks.


Antonio Flores (Columnist)

Lawyer Antonio Flores is the legal columnist for the Olive Press. Antonio has been practising law since 1997, year in which he began working for a large law firm in Marbella as a Property Lawyer. In 1998 he left the company he had joined a few months earlier, and used his knowledge and the experience gained to build his own practice. He is known throughout the community as independent, reputable and trustworthy. Through a combination of strong work ethics, determination and international exposure, his competence of Spanish Law is unparalleled and demonstrated through his fluency in English and Spanish.

1 Comment

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

giles column  e
Previous Story

Nothing compares 2 U

Valverde e
Next Story

Spaniard Alejandro Valverde aims to be oldest Giro D’Italia winner

Latest from Antonio Flores: Legal Problems

Go toTop

More From The Olive Press